PREFACEFrom the Greek classical antiquity, It admitted the existence of oppositional interaction between acting in the Economy (oikos) and in politics (polis) translated, during the course of the history of Western culture, as the reciprocal limitation of acting in the private life of civil society and public action of the State; involving the concepts of market and sovereignty in national spaces and in the globalized, when we accept the Anglo-Saxon terminology.Thus, during the course of time, such interactions show: First, the predominance of politics: Sovereignty, about private acting: the economy; criterion criticized by various thinkers between centuries XVII and XIX, as Montchrestien and Marx; Those who exalt the power of the factors and economic processes above political processes.Remember that the original hermeneutics: Socratic-Aristotelian, argues that to do for living well is an private activity, realized in its most part by the domestic slaves; while the political function is fulfilled by free citizens, in function of the public or collective good.From there that, when in the commercial exchange intervenes money, enriched by its use (the chrematistic) results a unreasonable for going against of the general good; even though recognizing that the enrichment requires a calculation; in other words, the importance of the components of mathematical rationality.During the XVII, Montchrestien and Rousseau proclaim that private activity of freemen must not be committed by the State; and, on the contrary, this should act as a good family father:The ménagerie publique. Later, in the XIX, Hegel and Marx Hermeneutics (1844) will put the bürgerliche Gesellshaft the Staatsökonomie; to rule out, that the economic reason points restrictions of metaphysical origin, considering that if the reasonable is the value (Heidegger) the judgement from prices is a metaphysical judgment (Menger) which it´s to contrast abstract laws to factual conditionants as historical facts (Methodenstreit), issue that lead to uncertainty.